Select region

Unlocking the full power of synchrony

Imagine personalizing your ventilation strategies for each patient, breath by breath, for more Lung and Diaphragm-protective ventilation (LDPV). Now, to complement our most personalized ventilation modes, NAVA and NIV NAVA, we are introducing Neural Pressure Support (NPS) and Non-invasive Neural Pressure Support (NIV NPS). These unique modes – available as options for the Servo-u ventilator system – have been designed to improve patient-ventilator synchrony in complex and challenging ICU patients in order to provide better outcomes. 

Unlocking the full power of synchrony

Clinical illustration comparing healthy diaphragm with diaphragm with atrophy caused by ventilator-induced diaphragm dysfunction

The diaphragm and VIDD

The diaphragm is in many ways the most important skeletal muscle for the preservation of life, helping to maximize oxygen intake and removal of CO2 to maintain a healthy normalized pH of the blood. Its continuous activity is fundamental for lung, heart and brain function, breath by breath.[1]

Ventilator-induced diaphragm dysfunction (VIDD) is prevalent in ventilated ICU patients, and associated with outcome, where diaphragm disuse atrophy due to prolonged controlled ventilation, excessive ventilator support and over-sedation are key factors.[2],[3],[4]

Clinical illustration comparing early expiratory cycling wave forms with reversed triggering wave forms

Asynchronies and VIDD

The growing research and recognition of the diaphragm, VIDD and its clinical impact has recently also revealed that early inspiratory flow termination, leading to potentially harmful eccentric diaphragm contractions are frequent during Pressure support ventilation.​[5]

Reverse triggering is another frequent type of asynchrony in which the diaphragm is triggered by the ventilator’s passive inflations, which may also generate potentially injurious eccentric diaphragm contractions, and double-triggering.[6],[7] 

Graphic illustration depicting the SILI self-inflicted lung injury vicious cycle hypothesis

Respiratory drive, effort and SILI

Another concept which has emerged as a major challenge for ICU providers is Self-inflicted lung injury (SILI) where the respiratory drive and effort play unique roles.

When the lung is inflated through a combination of positive ventilator pressure and negative patient-generated pressure, the result may be a harmful lung-distending transpulmonary pressure.[8],[9]

Dedicated monitoring and management of the patients’ respiratory drive and inspiratory efforts are now recommended to minimize risk of SILI.[10] 

Graphic illustration depicting the patients Edi signal, the vital sign of respiration

Edi monitoring

Electrical activity of the diaphragm (Edi) monitoring allows continuous access to the patient’s respiratory drive and has been confirmed as predictor of extubation success, by providing earlier information than conventional weaning parameters[11],[12]

Furthermore, for monitoring of inspiratory effort with the objective to assess lung-distending pressures, new methods based on static and dynamic ventilator maneuvers have been proposed, for future implementation in daily clinical practice.[13],[14],[15]

Graphic illustration depicting the NAVA Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist and NIV NAVA ventilator wave form

NAVA and NIV NAVA

A large randomized multi-centre trial, showed that NAVA significantly increased the number of ventilator-free days and shortened the time of mechanical ventilation by almost 35%.[16]

The lung- and diaphragm protective principles in NAVA are that the tidal volume is controlled by the patient’s respiratory center where the delivered inspiratory pressure support is in synchrony and proportional with diaphragmatic muscle activity, which is continuously visible for the intensive care providers.[17],[18],[19] 

Graphic illustration depicting the NPS Neural Pressure Support and NIV NAVA ventilator wave form

NPS and NIV NPS

The new NPS modes offer clinicians the opportunity to set PS with neural trigger and breath termination synchronized with diaphragmatic activity. This may reduce the incidence of premature expiratory cycling, and also minimize the risk of harmful eccentric diaphragm contractions, which have been found to be common with conventional flow-cycled PS.[20],[21],[22]

A golden opportunity in both NAVA and NPS, is the principle of real-time titration of ventilatory support to a neural respiratory drive target zone, and safeguard appropriate diaphragm activity.

Graphic illustration showing both obstructive COPD non-invasive patient with mask and restrictive ARDS intubated patient

Restricted and obstructed lungs

Compared to NAVA, the faster pressurization rate in NPS may offer advantages in managing restrictive (e.g. ARDS) and obstructive (e.g. COPD) patients, particularly those with high respiratory drive contributing to excessive lung-distending pressures.[20],[22]

Should the patients’ respiratory drive and inspiratory efforts not self-regulate to achieve lung-protective targets, titration of inspiratory rise time and PEEP may be carefully assessed. Further control of respiratory drive may also be achieved by titration of sedation or neuromuscular blockers.[23]

Graphic illustration of human figures illustrating the benefits of NAVA and NPS such as respiratory muscle exercise, and a sun and moon depicting day to night shifts when fewer experienced clinical staff are available

Combining NAVA and NPS

A unique benefit of neurally controlled modes are that they allow for muscle exercise targeting more physiological levels of Edi. NAVA and NPS can be used in intervals with a variation in respiratory muscle unloading, where the training intensity is higher in NAVA and more rest is provided in NPS.[24],[25]

There is also an opportunity to alter the choice of mode during day and night, for example if the ICU is lowered staffed at night with less specialized intensive care providers, who may be less confident to use NAVA compared to NPS.

Graphic illustration showing an x-ray of a human torso with lungs, diaphragm and Edi signal as well as NAVA and NPS waveforms

Implementation

The NPS modes are considered to fill a gap between conventional and neurally controlled ventilation, where the combination of Edi monitoring, NAVA and NPS can be used to facilitate an effective implementation of the technology into clinical practice in a complex and time-pressured ICU environment.

A stepwise implementation approach can now be undertaken where purely Edi monitoring is the initial step, followed by NPS and completed with NAVA being the pinnacle of personalized ventilation.

Literature and Education

Learn more about the benefits of Getinge’s approach to Personalized ventilation and our latest pioneering mechanical ventilation technologies and innovations.

Tablet computer displaying the Getinge Academy training and education web page for NPS and NAVA

NPS & NAVA training and education

Find out more about the NPS and NAVA modes of ventilation on our Academy Educational website.

Tablet computer displaying a slide from the Servo-u product e-brochure showing an exploded view of a Servo-u ventilator system

The Servo-u ventilator system

Explore the Servo-u eBrochure & discover how our flagship Servo ventilator can support you in the ICU. 

Tablet computer displaying a slide from the Servo-u functionalities flyer showing an Edi hardware module and NPS x-ray torso graphic illustration

Servo-u functionalities

Make the most of your Servo-u with additional functionalities and our latest software options.

Explore our products

Discover more about the Servo ventilator systems

  1. 1. Perry SF, et al. The evolutionary orgin of the mammalian diaphragm. Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2010 Apr 15;171(1):1-16.

  2. 2. Dres M, Goligher EC, Heunks LMA et al Critical illness-associated diaphragm weakness. Intensive Care Med 2017 43(10):1441–1452

  3. 3. Goligher EC, Dres M, Fan E et al Mechanical ventilation-induced diaphragm atrophy strongly impacts clinical outcomes. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2018 197(2):204–213

  4. 4. Kyo M, Shimatani T, Hosokawa K, et al. Patient–ventilator asynchrony, impact on clinical outcomes and effectiveness of interventions: a systematic review and metaanalysis. J Intensive Care. 2021; 9: 50.

  5. 5. Coiffard B, Dianti J, Telias I et al Dyssynchronous diaphragm contractions impair diaphragm function in mechanically ventilated patients. Crit Care. 2024 Apr 2;28(1):1076)

  6. 6. Akoumianaki E et al Mechanical ventilation-induced reverse-triggered breaths: a frequently unrecognized form of neuromechanical coupling. Chest 2013 143:927-938.

  7. 7. Rodrigues A, Vieira F, Sklar MC et al Post-insufflation diaphragm contractions in patients receiving various modes of mechanical ventilation. Crit Care. 2024 Sep 18;28(1):310.

  8. 8. Mauri T. et al Spontaneous breathing: a double-edged sword to handle with care Ann Transl Med 2017;5(14)292.

  9. 9. Yoshida T. et al Spontaneous Effort Causes Occult Pendelluft during Mechanical Ventilation Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2013 Vol 188, Iss. 12, pp 1420–1427.

  10. 10. Mirabella L, Cinnella G, Gregoretti C et al. Patient-Ventilator Asynchronies: Clinical Implications and Practical Solutions. Respir Care. 2020 Nov;65(11):1751-1766.

  11. 11. Barwing J. et al. Electrical activity of the diaphragm (EAdi) as a monitoring parameter in difficult weaning from respirator: a pilot study. Crit Care. 2013 Aug 28;17(4):R182.

  12. 12. Bellani G., Pesenti A. Assessing effort and work of breathing. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2014 Jun;20(3):352-8.

  13. 13. Grasselli G. et al. Assessment of Airway Driving Pressure and Respiratory System Mechanics during Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2019 Sep 15;200(6):785-788

  14. 14. de Vries HJ. et al. Performance of Noninvasive Airway Occlusion Maneuvers to Assess Lung Stress and Diaphragm Effort in Mechanically Ventilated Critically Ill Patients. Anesthesiology. 2023 Mar 1;138(3):274-288

  15. 15. Liu L, He H, Liang M et al. Estimation of transpulmonary driving pressure using a lower assist maneuver (LAM) during synchronized ventilation in patients with acute respiratory failure: a physiological study. Intensive Care Med Exp. 2024 Oct 4;12(1):89

  16. 16. Kacmarek R et al. Neurally adjusted ventilatory assist in acute respiratory failure: a randomized controlled trial. Intensive Care Med 2020. Sep 6 : 1–11. (N.B. Servo-i ventilator systems were used in the clinical trial.)

  17. 17. Sinderby C, et al. Neural control of mechanical ventilation in respiratory failure. Nat Med. 1999 Dec;5(12):1433-6.

  18. 18. Patroniti, et al. Respiratory pattern during neurally adjusted ventilatory assist in acute respiratory failure patients. Intensive Care Med. 2012 Feb;38(2):230-9.

  19. 19. Jonkmann et al. Proportional modes of ventilation: technology to assist physiology Intensive Care Med

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-020-06206-z
  20. 20. Costa A. et al. The new neural pressure support (NPS) mode and the helmet: Did we find the dynamic duo? J Anesth Analg Crit Care. 2024 Jun 10;4(1):35

  21. 21. Coiffard B. et al. Dyssynchronous diaphragm contractions impair diaphragm function in mechanically ventilated patients. Crit Care. 2024 Apr 2;28(1):107.

  22. 22. Colombo S.M. et al. Neural pressure support ventilation as a novel strategy to improve patient-ventilator synchrony in adult respiratory distress syndrome. Br J Anaesth. 2023 Apr;130(4):e430-e432

  23. 23. Doorduin J. et al Partial Neuromuscular Blockade during Partial Ventilatory Support in Sedated Patients with High Tidal Volumes. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017 Apr 15;195(8):1033-1042.

  24. 24. Cecchini J. et al. Increased diaphragmatic contribution to inspiratory effort during neurally adjusted ventilatory assistance versus pressure support: an electro-myographic study. Anesthesiology. 2014 Nov;121(5):1028-36.

  25. 25. Di Mussi R. et al. Impact of prolonged assisted ventilationon diaphragmatic efficiency: NAVA versus PSV. Crit Care. 2016 Jan 5;20(1):1.